As a teen growing up in northern Toronto, Faranak Farzan was troubled by a seemingly unanswerable question: Why were people willing to speak openly about their physical problems, be it poor eyesight or a broken leg, yet, when it came to mental health, the afflicted often suffered in silence?
As her fascination with the inner workings of the brain grew, Farzan began a unique and challenging academic regimen that included biomedical and electrical engineering, as well as psychology, starting at McMaster University.
Today, she is a mechatronic systems engineering professor and Chair in Technology Innovations for Youth Addiction Recovery and Mental Health at Simon Fraser University and founder and head of SFU’s CFI-funded eBrain Lab.
We talked to her to find out how alternative technologies can be used to diagnose and treat addiction and mental health illnesses such as depression.
CFI: Your authentic concern for youth who are vulnerable to depression and addiction is striking. Where does that sensitivity come from?
Farzan: Out of every five individuals, one of them will be impacted by mental health. In our lives, we will be caring for somebody who has a mental health issue, and if it's not ourselves, it's someone that is very near and dear to us. The brain is really complex. We don't know how it works. For any brain illnesses and illnesses that arise from the nervous system, which mental illnesses are, we haven’t had the tools to study them. That causes this disparity between mental illness and physical illness. This is where my curiosity comes from.
CFI: The eBrain Lab at SFU's Surrey campus takes a unique approach to studying mental illness and addiction. How is it different?
Farzan: The eBrain Lab is about bringing disciplines together to develop new ways of understanding and treating mental health illnesses.
The lab has two essential features. One is the transdisciplinary approach that I believe is the future of mental health care. We integrate engineering, neuroscience, psychiatry, psychology and computer science to co-create new technologies. We need to combine them all due to the complexity of the challenge to develop meaningful solutions that are translatable to real-life settings.
The other aspect that is unique with eBrain Lab is our collaboration with the community. The City of Surrey has one of the highest youth populations in British Columbia, and there is a real need for the community to address youth addiction and mental health. We start with what the community needs are and involve people with lived experience in technology creation.
What if mental illness could be treated without drugs?
Hear Faranak Farzan describe how her research could provide alternatives for treating mental illness that may be more effective and reliable than pharmaceuticals
2 minutes, 25 seconds to listen
Transcript of the sound clip: "What if mental illness could be treated without drugs?"
CFI: You’re combining engineering with health disciplines to better understand how brain function and mental illness interact. What kinds of equipment are you using to do this?
Farzan: Since mental illnesses are illnesses of the nervous system, we need tools to be able to look at how the nervous system functions in a cause and effect way. For example, you could stimulate the brain and study the reaction by looking at how its function changes or how certain circuitries work.
To do this, we develop technologies like computational methods, machine learning, wearable sensors for collecting data in the community, and neuromodulation technologies. Neuromodulation technologies allow us to stimulate the brain and objectively quantify and assess its function and neurocircuitries.
One neuromodulation technology is transcranial magnetic stimulation, which allows activating certain brain circuities noninvasively. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a form of TMS that we can tailor to create treatments for patients who cannot tolerate or respond to antidepressant medications. We use rTMS to selectively target the circuitries implicated in youth depression, for example. The non-invasiveness is really key here.
What if we could predict how a person will respond to treatment by observing their brain? Hear Faranak Farzan describe her seminal research paper published in early 2020 that shows it’s possible to predict how people with depression will respond to treatment
1 minute, 53 seconds to listen
Transcript of the sound clip “What if we could predict how a person will respond to treatment by observing their brain?”
[FARZAN] The problem we have with depression in general, and includes … adult depression, is that there are lots of treatments but it takes years before clinicians could identify which treatment could work better for which patient.
So the process of offering the treatment to patients is very trial-and-error and it’s not objective. It’s not like you go and get your blood drawn or you get some sort of neuroimaging done and someone says okay, this is the right treatment for you, right? And in order to answer this big question, we need to see the data, bigger initiative.
We just published a paper … right before COVID, in January 2020, showing that in fact, using the technologies, we can actually predict which a patient with depression is going to respond to the treatment.
I’m not sure if you’ve had anyone impacted by depression, a lot of us do because it’s just so prevalent. It takes months before the treatments are showing their effect.
And the million dollar question is: Before the patient started treatment … before even the treatment starts is the treatment going to be successful for this patient or not?
The technologies … can actually tell us with 80 percent accuracy, okay, this person is a good candidate for this. We were the first to publish this work and this is a very hot area.
The big picture view here is to save people time from spending time in untreated depression, which leads to suicide, which leads to time away from work and [this is] very costly stuff for the society, quite costly.
Once we activate the nervous system, we can look at its behavior and its function. We do that by another technology called electroencephalography (EEG), which we use to quantify the activation of the nervous system. We stimulate different parts of the brain and study the reaction. We ask: “How do specific circuitries look in the brain of youth with depression versus healthy youth? What brain circuity is underlying this particular illness? And, can we modify them to create a behavioural change?”
We also run studies with community partners on addiction recovery programs. We have portable equipment that allows us to record signals outside the lab in an individual’s home or real-life environment.
It’s like your doctor tapping your knee to check your reflexes. We do pretty much the same thing, but with the brain. How do certain circuitries look in a brain of an individual who has depression versus those who don't. We compare those to see what is impaired, what doesn't seem to be the same.
CFI: What sorts of questions are you trying to answer?
Farzan: For example, in an addiction recovery program we can look at the brain activity as they’re engaged in therapy and follow them over time to see how the brain is changing in response to different treatments. We also want to know if we can we predict who is going to respond to what treatment and also to predict who is going to have a relapse and when are they safe to go back to their normal life. Can we predict that from looking at brain waves and brain circuitries and how they evolve over time?
These kinds of questions aren’t new — we’ve been asking them for centuries. We haven’t found the answer to them because we haven’t had the right methodology. eBrain Centre is all about using new methodologies to answer these questions. What is depression? What is addiction? Can we predict what treatments will work?
CFI: You’re particularly interested in mental health and addiction in young people. What is it about the 18- to 24-year-old brain that makes it so vulnerable?
Farzan: The brain develops well into our twenties. Somewhere between 16 to 29 years old the brain is undergoing its final modifications. It's one of the last things that evolves as we become adults.
Also, if you think about the social aspect, that's about the age when you leave home and you go out into society. So your environment changes and any change in the environment challenges the brain to find its stability again.
Then you have a third element and that is peers. So become less influenced by your family and more influenced by society. This is also when individuals start experimenting with drugs and alcohol.
In addition to all of that, youth, for instance youth depression, are less likely to respond to pharmaceutical interventions as they can create some unwanted side effects. So all of this happens at the same time, and that's what makes this age really important to attend to.
COVID-19 has especially impacted youth — the 16- to 24-years age group — as it has deprived individuals of much needed social connection and control over their future. They are struggling and may reach out for drugs. As a result of COVID-19, we're going to see a surge in mental health issues.
CFI: What motivates you?
Farzan: My motivation is to reduce human pain and suffering. You see young folks taking their own lives to suicide; it must be an unbearable amount of pain and suffering that drives someone to that edge. So this really gets me going — to prevent that.
What if alternative technologies could help address the mental health and addiction crisis that COVID-19 has exacerbated?
Hear Faranak Farzan describe how COVID-19 and the opioid crisis in B.C. make finding different ways to treat mental health and addiction in young people more pressing than ever
3 minutes, 21 seconds to listen
Transcript of the sound clip “What if alternative technologies could help address the mental health and addiction crisis that COVID-19 has exacerbated?”
[FARZAN] I work with addiction recovery in youth, which is a major societal challenge here in B.C. particularly. People who died from overdose this month [summer 2020] far exceeded suicide, COVID and there was a third element, so it’s really a major issue for us in B.C.
I have a partnership with an addiction recovery program, where they bring clients who are trying to recover from addiction and everything else that’s ailing them.
They stayed in this program for two years to try to recover and it’s the burning question for the parents of these youth and caretakers is that okay, how do we know who is doing well? How do we know after two years they’re not going to go out there and overdose? How do we know that? Can we look at something in the brain that will help us figure that out ahead of time? So we call these predictors of relapse.
And two, can we help them facilitate this process? It takes two years to recover, is there any way for technology to help us help them more? And something that I need to highlight here is that a lot of these folks who are going through addictions — the recovery — a lot of times a lot of them have underlying depression, anxiety sometimes as primary diagnosis that is a major struggle with them.
We’re running clinical trials with a few of these folks in this facility who agreed to participate in our research and they’re receiving this treatment over time and with the neuroimaging equipment that we have acquired, we’re looking at how their brain is changing over time.
And we’re using that data to first, understand how our treatment is working, is it helping them? And two, to predict ahead of time who might be ready to graduate from the program and go out there safely without falling into overdose because people who do graduate and have been abstinent for a long time, they’re at much higher risk to overdose.
It’s quite clear that COVID has increased and has exacerbated a lot of vulnerabilities for mental health and particularly in the youth.
Something that also happened during COVID was people were not able to see their therapists one-on-one. And the question was: Okay, do they even need to see the therapist one-on-one? Could online therapy work as well? And how can we know that, right?
We’re actually looking at the brain when people are having one-on-one behavioural therapy. And then we’re looking at the brain and how it changes through that. And then the question becomes: Is it better, the one-on-one, or is the web-based platform and digitized platforms, are they doing a good enough job? And if they are effective, we should offer them because that solves quite a few issues here, people in remote areas that cannot access it. This is thinking even beyond COVID times.